|
School Safety, Part
III: The Aftermath of Crisis
Howard Johnston
University of South Florida
(Click
here for a print friendly version.)

(A photo
from our 2007 Summer Leadership Institute.)
The crisis is finally
over. The intruder has been removed, the severe weather
has abated, the fire is out, the epidemic ended, or
the explosives proven to be a hoax. There is relief,
perhaps sadness or grief over the school community’s
losses, and a sense of calm – something like
that following a hurricane or blizzard.
Now, school leaders confront
three of the most difficult issues in dealing with
a school crisis – repairing the physical damage,
if there has been any, restoring orderly routines to
the school, and the much more challenging task of reducing
anxiety and restoring confidence and calm in the school
community. Restoring physical and organizational normalcy
is challenging, but progress in doing so is concrete
and observable. It is much more difficult to address
the silent, insidious and subtle psychological and
emotional effects of the school crisis – the
corrosive effects of sustained fear, anxiety and anger
often experienced by the survivors of a serious crisis.
Unfortunately, there have
been enough school crises in America so that these
issues have been studied in some detail. Fortunately,
these studies provide sound guidance to school leaders
intent on restoring both the organizational and emotional
health of their schools in the aftermath of a crisis.
Guidelines for
School Leaders
The U. S. Department of
Education’s division of Safe and Drug Free Schools
publication, Practical Information on Crisis Planning:
A Guide for Schools and Communities, provides a comprehensive
model for school crisis planning and intervention that
has served as the foundation for this series of articles.
This model calls for four major components:
• Mitigation and
Prevention – reducing the likelihood of a school
crisis through careful attention to the needs of
students and the community
• Preparedness – facilitating a rapid,
coordinated, effective response to a crisis if it
occurs
• Response – following the crisis plan
and making full use of all available resources
• Recovery – returning to learning and
restoring the infrastructure as quickly as possible
The Guide describes key
features and actions for a rapid and effective recovery,
including several that show attention to the special
needs of young people in a school setting. This sensitivity
is a crucial ingredient in assuring a full recovery
from the school crisis and must permeate every aspect
of the school’s plan for healing itself.
• Strive to return
to learning as quickly as possible.
• Restore the physical plant, as well as the school
community.
•Monitor how staff are assessing students for the
emotional impact of the crisis.
• Identify what follow up interventions are available
to students, staff, and first responders.
• Conduct debriefings with staff and first responders.
• Assess curricular activities that address the crisis.
• Allocate appropriate time for recovery.
• Plan how anniversaries of events will be commemorated.
• Capture "lessons learned" and incorporate
them into revisions and trainings.
Psychological
and Emotional Responses
The National Association
of School Psychologists (www. nasponline.org) provides
a rich resource of materials for school leaders and
communities that are facing the aftermath of a crisis
in their school. From individual acts of violence to
natural disasters and terrorism, NASP offers research-based
action steps for school officials that respond to the
psychological and emotional needs of crisis victims
while respecting the cultural and religious norms that
exist in the school’s community. Their recommendations
are summarized in a general model for dealing with
the aftermath of a crisis published by the U.S. Department
of Education, Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative
Services, Early Warning, Timely Response.
The advice offered in
this report supplies an excellent guide for school
leaders and offers a planning checklist to assure comprehensive
attention to key topics and issues. The report recommends
that “members of the crisis team should understand
natural stress reactions. They also should be familiar
with how different individuals might respond to death
and loss, including developmental considerations, religious
beliefs, and cultural values. Effective schools ensure
a coordinated community response. Professionals both
within the school district and within the greater community
should be involved to assist individuals who are at
risk for severe stress reactions."
They report that schools
that have experienced crises and tragedy have included
the following provisions in their response plans. These
recommendations are noteworthy for their emphasis on
restoring mental health and emotional balance and have
a unique emphasis on assisting with the return of students
who may have been actors in the school crisis.
• Help
parents understand children’s reactions
to violence or disaster. In the aftermath of tragedy,
children may experience unrealistic fears of the
future, have difficulty sleeping, become physically
ill, and be easily distracted to name a few of the
common symptoms.
• Help teachers and other staff deal
with their reactions to the crisis. Debriefing and grief counseling is
just as important for adults as it is for students.
Help students and faculty adjust after
the crisis. Provide both short-term and long-term
mental health
counseling following a crisis.
• Help victims and family members of victims re-enter
the school environment. Often, school friends need
guidance in how to act. The school community should
work with students and parents to design a plan that
makes it easier for victims and their classmates
to adjust.
• Help students and teachers address the return of
a previously removed student to the school community. Whether the student is returning from a juvenile
detention facility or a mental health facility, schools
need to coordinate with staff from that facility
to explore how to make the transition as uneventful
as possible.
Adult Roles
Ultimately, the adults
in the school assume responsibility for restoring the
emotional and mental health of the students and staff
exposed to a crisis. First, it is necessary to understand
how young people are likely to respond to a crisis:
what is ‘normal’ in the face of trauma?
In Tips for Talking to Children After a Disaster: A
Guide for Parents and Teachers, The U.S. Department
of Health and Human Services National Mental Health
Information Center describes common effects of school
trauma on adolescents:
Children age 12 to 14
are likely to have vague physical complaints when
under stress and may abandon chores, schoolwork,
and other responsibilities they previously handled.
Though they may compete vigorously for attention
from parents and teachers, they may also withdraw,
resist authority, become disruptive at home or in
the classroom, or even begin to experiment with high-risk
behaviors such as alcohol or drug use.
These young people are
at a developmental stage in which the opinions of
others are very important. They need to be thought
of as “normal” by their friends and are
less concerned about relating well with adults or
participating in recreation or family activities
they once enjoyed.
In later adolescence,
teens may experience feelings of helplessness and
guilt because they are unable to assume full adult
responsibilities as the community responds to the
disaster. Older teens may also deny the extent of
their emotional reactions to the traumatic event.
The Mental Health Information
Center also offers specific tips for talking with students
about disaster and trauma:
• Provide children
with opportunities to talk about what they are seeing
on television and to ask questions.
• Don’t be afraid to admit that you can’t
answer all their questions.
• Answer questions at a level the child can understand.
• Provide ongoing opportunities for children to talk.
They will probably have more questions as time goes
on.
•Use this as an opportunity to establish a family
emergency plan. Feeling that there is something you
can do may be very comforting to both children and
adults.
• Allow children to discuss other fears and concerns
about unrelated issues. This is a good opportunity
to explore these issues also.
•Monitor children’s television watching.
Some parents may wish to limit their child’s
exposure to graphic or troubling scenes. To the extent
possible,
watch reports of the disaster with children. It is
at these times that questions might arise.
• Help children understand that there are no bad
emotions and that a wide range of reactions is normal.
Encourage
children to express their feelings to adults (including
teachers and parents) who can help them understand
their sometimes strong and troubling emotions.
• Try not to focus on blame.
• In addition to the tragic things they see, help
children identify good things, such as heroic actions,
families
who are grateful for being reunited, and the assistance
offered by people throughout the country and the
world.
Everyone agrees that the
aftermath of a school crisis requires on-going attention
and empathic leadership. David Schonfeld and Scott
Newgass, from the Yale Child Study Center’s National
Center for Children Exposed to Violence, summarize
the critical elements of this on-going response http://www.nccev.org/docs/OVCSchoolcrisisBulletin.pdf).
• Utilize principles
of mental health triage to get counseling services
to those most in need of them – usually the
individuals closest to the crisis event and its victims.
•Plan for long-term follow up to assist with immediate
post-trauma counseling and cope with the reactions
that may develop over time. Monitor students and
faculty closely for evidence of delayed traumatic
stress.
• Plan for memorialization of the event in a way that
is healing, dignified and respects the different
ways in which individuals and cultures express grief
and sorrow. Be particularly mindful that the decisions
about memorials will set a precedent for other, perhaps
less tragic, events.
• Enhance community resources by establishing and
supporting a community-wide network of responders
and mental
health providers who can help plan for school crises
and assist in the follow up to a crisis if necessary.
A Final Word
No one likes to think
about a school crisis and the horrible tragedies that
might accompany it. But just as religious and cultural
rituals help to heal and comfort bereaved, grieving
individuals, a comprehensive, carefully developed,
sensitive, culturally-responsive plan for dealing with
the aftermath of a school disaster will speed the healing
of its victims and the school’s return to the
business of learning.
References and Resources
National Association of
School Psychologists
http://www.nasponline.org/resources/crisis_safety/index.aspx
NASP provides a virtual library of resources for crisis
management and response for all kinds of potential
threats – violence, terrorism, natural disasters,
epidemics, and a host of others.
American Psychological Association
http://www.apa.org/topics
This venerable group has a superb library of online
and printed materials dealing with all aspects of crisis
mitigation and response. They even provide reading
and counseling material for students who have survived
a crisis.
Fairfax County (VA) Public Schools Crisis Management
Workbook
http://www.fcps.edu/fts/safety-security/publications/cmw.pdf
This online publication outlines a very thorough and
concrete planning process, including preparing for
the aftermath of a school crisis.
American Academy of Pediatrics
http://www.aap.org/featured/resourcepage.htm
AAP provides a comprehensive list of post-crisis resources
to help students and families adjust to the trauma
they have experienced.
See our Feature
Article Archives for past articles!
|