|
Need exists for ‘solid,
objective’ ways
to measure teachers’ effectiveness
Lew Armisted
LA Communications
(Click
here for a print friendly version.)

(A photo
from our 2007 Summer Leadership Institute.)
While school
leaders frequently hear education reformers say that
effective teaching is defined by improvements to student
learning, those reformers issue conflicting statements
on how to measure such effectiveness and use those
assessments to improve teaching. That’s the contention
of a new issue brief, Measuring and Improving the Effectiveness
of High School Teachers, presented by the Alliance
for Excellent Education this spring.
Thus far, most of the policy debate on teacher effectiveness
has focused on using test scores to implement merit
pay or to fire teachers, but those strategies alone
will not lift teacher performance on a large scale,” the
brief reads. “The best way to improve teacher
effectiveness is to provide teachers with support
and guidance that … uses effectiveness data
to enhance professional development and teacher education,
strengthen
evaluations and career development, and revamp accountability
policies to reward and encourage student learning.”
The Alliance called for an investment in “solid,
objective ways to measure a teacher’s effectiveness” and
outlined a “value-added” approach to achieve
that during a conference in Washington, D.C., in late
March. Value-added is a complex statistical means to
measure a teacher or school’s direct impact on
student achievement. It eliminates other casual factors
such as family income level, previous educational experiences,
and other school characteristics. Rather, it attempts
to isolate the direct impact an individual teacher
has on a student’s success while in that teacher’s
classroom.
While the value-added approach has merit, it is not
perfect, Jeremy Ayers, an Alliance policy and advocacy
associate, said at the March conference. “It
works best when supplemented with other measures of
student learning and of teacher knowledge and skills.”
The value-added approach estimates how much academic
growth a student should be expected to make during
the year and, at the end of the year, compares that
figure with actual student gains on standardized
tests.
"Students who make greater gains than expected are judged
to have teachers who ‘added value’ whereas
students who did less well than anticipated have
teachers who did not,” the brief points out.
If a student achieves at the predicted level, the
teacher is viewed
as neither adding value nor hindering that youngster’s
progress.
The Alliance also points that out
using value-added measurements can be more complicated
in high schools
than in the earlier grades, especially in the humanities
where students are influenced by many teachers.
It’s
easier to measure in the core subjects that have
readily available standardized tests. If these obstacles
can be overcome, the value-added
approach can isolate teacher effectiveness in an
objective and comparable way and lead to discussions
about teacher
improvement that are based on student outcomes.
Teachers who are deemed to have added value can
be used as
models for others.
“A primary goal of measuring high school teacher effectiveness
is to improve the knowledge and skills of teachers
so that they improve student achievement,” the
brief reads. The Alliance outlined three areas
where improvement efforts should focus—
• enhancing professional development and teacher preparation;
• strengthening evaluations and career development; and
• revamping accountability policies.
Enhancing Professional
Development and
Teacher Preparation
“The most immediate use for effectiveness measures is
to target and strengthen professional development,
including evaluating which professional development
programs are the most productive in enhancing
teacher effectiveness,” the brief reads. Since value-added
can identify the high and low performing teachers,
it can leverage “the expertise of top-performers
to improve the skill of low-performers, with
the caveat that some chronically low-performers
may need to be
counseled out of the profession.”
The brief questions the value of one-day workshops
but indicates that regular staff development
that occurs in the school and is developed
with teacher
input can
improve teacher effectiveness. In high schools
research also demonstrates that effectives
improves “when
teachers collaborate as part of learning communities—groups
of teachers working together (rather than apart as
most teachers do) to improve student achievement and
to build a culture of shared responsibility for learning.”
The brief cites a professional development
project that is driven by teachers and effectiveness
data at Norview High School in Norfolk, VA. “Teachers
were grouped into teams by subject area, adopted shared
curriculum guides and common assessments, and met regularly
as teams around assessment data in order to review
student progress. To evaluate their effectiveness as
teachers, teams focused on three central questions: ‘What
am I teaching well?’; ‘What am I not teaching
well?’; and even ‘Why do your students
perform better than mine?’ Struggling teachers
observed successful teachers in the classroom. Six
years later, the results were clear: Norview raised
achievement and narrowed gaps.”
Strengthening
Evaluations and Career Development
Evaluations are generally dismissed as an effective
way to improve teacher effectiveness since
most evaluation tools are poorly constructed
and administered
haphazardly,
according to the brief.
"On the other hand, meaningful evaluation instruments
do exist, and they hold promise for identifying
and improving effective teaching,” the brief reports. “The
best evaluations have explicit standards
for the instruction to be assessed and clear rubrics
for assessing it.
Good evaluations take place several times
throughout the year and are administered by multiple evaluators,
some of whom are peers and some of whom are
administrators.”
The brief also indicates the value of career
ladders focused on improving teaching work
in conjunction
with evaluations and effectiveness data.
School systems in Rochester, NY, and Denver
are cited
for effective
use of career ladders.
The Teacher Advancement Program (TAP), used
in approximately 15 high schools in seven
states, is a promising approach
to teacher evaluation and career development,
according to the Alliance. “TAP’s success is due
not to an evaluation instrument alone, but rather to
how it fits within a larger framework of professional
development, career advancement, and differentiated
pay. In TAP, teachers meet weekly in clusters, led
by master and mentor teachers, to review student work
and to improve instruction. Cluster meetings provide
ongoing, job-embedded professional development, and
the roles of master and mentor teachers provide effective
teachers with a career ladder and additional pay.” More
information about TAP can be found at www.talentedteachers.org.
Revamping Accountability
Policies
The brief outlines a broad approach to accountability
to improve teacher effectiveness.
“Effectiveness measures may work best to revamp accountability
policies when responsibility for student
growth primarily rests on the shoulders of schools as a whole, since
multiple teachers contribute to student
learning, particularly at the high school level. Furthermore, cooperation
between, rather than competition among,
teachers is needed to improve student achievement on a large scale.
To move toward the goal of college and work
force readiness for students, three areas
need to receive
focus, according
to the brief:
• Measures of student learning must improve;
• Policymakers and educators must develop and strengthen
teacher effectiveness measures that
access knowledge, skill, and classroom practice; and
• Policymakers and educators must improve the school
structures that allow effectiveness
measures to improve teaching.
The complete issue brief and video from the
conference can be seen at http://www.all4ed.org/events/effectiveness_HSteachers.
See our Feature
Article Archives for past articles! |